Поглиблений розбір

Приповісті 25:28

Простий, ясний розбір цього вірша. Читати розділ →

Люди́на, що стри́му немає для духу свого, — це зруйно́ване місто без му́ру.

Коментарі

Витяги з опублікованих коментарів, щоб закласти основу прочитання.

Keil-Delitzsch Old Testament Commentaryвірш 28

This verse, counselling restraint as to the spirit, is connected with the foregoing, which counsels to self-control as to enjoyment: A city broken through, now without walls - A man without self-control over his spirit. A "city broken down" is one whose wall is "broken," Ch2 32:5, whether it has met with breaches (פּרצים), or is wholly broken; in the former case also the city is incapable of being defended, and it is all one as if it had no wall. Such a city is like a man "who hath no control over his own spirit" (for the accentuation of the Heb. words here, vid., Thorath Emeth, p. 10): cujus spiritui nulla cohibitio (Schultens), i.e., qui animum suum cohibere non potest (Fleischer: עצר, R. צר, to press together, to oppress, and thereby to hold back). As such a city can be plundered and laid waste without trouble, so a man who knows not to hold in check his desires and affections is in constant danger of blindly following the impulse of his unbridled sensuality, and of being hurried forward to outbreaks of passion, and thus of bringing unhappiness upon himself. There are sensual passions (e.g., drunkenness), intellectual (e.g., ambition), mingled (e.g., revenge); but in all of these a false ego rules, which, instead of being held down by the true and better ego, rises to unbounded supremacy. (Note: Vid., Drbal's Empirische Psychologie, 137.) Therefore the expression used is not לנפשׁו, but לרוּחו; desire has its seat in the soul, but in the spirit it grows into passion, which in the root of all its diversities is selfishness (Psychol. p. 199); self-control is accordingly the ruling of the spirit, i.e., the restraining (keeping down) of the false enslaved ego-life by the true and free, and powerful in God Himself.

Відкрити джерело ↗
Matthew Henry Bible Commentaryвірш 28

Here is, 1. The good character of a wise and virtuous man implied. He is one that has rule over his own spirit; he maintains the government of himself, and of his own appetites and passions, and does not suffer them to rebel against reason and conscience. He has the rule of his own thoughts, his desires, his inclinations, his resentments, and keeps them all in good order. 2. The bad case of a vicious man, who has not this rule over his own spirit, who, when temptations to excess in eating or drinking are before him, has no government of himself, when he is provoked breaks out into exorbitant passions, such a one is like a city that is broken down and without walls. All that is good goes out, and forsakes him; all that is evil breaks in upon him. He lies exposed to all the temptations of Satan and becomes an easy prey to that enemy; he is also liable to many troubles and vexations; it is likewise as much a reproach to him as it is to a city to have its walls ruined, Neh 1:3.

Відкрити джерело ↗

Перехресні посилання

Інші уривки, які спільнота найчастіше пов'язує з цим. Торкнись, щоб прочитати.

Приповісті 16:32ранг 25

Ліпший від силача́, хто не скорий до гніву, хто ж панує над собою самим, ліпший від завойо́вника міста.

Приповісті 22:24ранг 14

Не дружись із чоловіком гнівли́вим, і не ходи із люди́ною лютою,

2-а хроніки 32:5ранг 5

І він підбадьорився, і забудував увесь ви́ломаний мур, і поставив на нього ба́шту, а поза тим муром — інший мур, і зміцни́в Мілло в Давидовому Місті, і наробив багато ра́тищ та щиті́в.

Неемія 1:3ранг 5

А вони сказали мені: „Позосталі, що лишилися з полону, там в окрузі, живуть у великій біді та в га́ньбі, а мур Єрусалиму поруйно́ваний, а брами його попа́лені огнем“...

1-а Самуїлова 20:30ранг 4

І запалав Саулів гнів на Йонатана, і він сказав йому: „Негідний і неслухня́ний си́ну! Чи ж не знаю я, що ти вибрав Єссеєвого сина на свій сором та на сором і неславу своєї матері?

1-а Самуїлова 25:17ранг 1

А тепер пізнай та побач, що́ зробиш, бо дозріло зло на нашого пана та на ввесь дім його. А він негідний, із ним не можна говорити“.

Твої роздуми