Йов 6:30
Простий, ясний розбір цього вірша. Читати розділ →
Хіба́ в мене на язиці є неправда? чи ж не маю смаку́, щоб розпізнати нещастя?
Коментарі
Витяги з опублікованих коментарів, щоб закласти основу прочитання.
Eliphaz concluded his discourse with an air of assurance; very confident he was that what he had said was so plain and so pertinent that nothing could be objected in answer to it. But, though he that is first in his own cause seems just, yet his neighbour comes and searches him. Job is not convinced by all he had said, but still justifies himself in his complaints and condemns him for the weakness of his arguing. I. He shows that he had just cause to complain as he did of his troubles, and so it would appear to any impartial judge (Job 6:2-7). II. He continues his passionate wish that he might speedily be cut off by the stroke of death, and so be eased of all his miseries (Job 6:8-13). III. He reproves his friends for their uncharitable censures of him and their unkind treatment (v. 14-30). It must be owned that Job, in all this, spoke much that was reasonable, but with a mixture of passion and human infirmity. And in this contest, as indeed in most contests, there was fault on both sides.
Відкрити джерело ↗6:30 Don’t I know the difference between right and wrong? (literally Can’t my palate discern malice?): Job might have been echoing his earlier comment about a tasteless, revolting diet (6:6-7).
Відкрити джерело ↗Мова оригіналу
Єврейські та грецькі слова за цим уривком, із номерами Стронга — від openscriptures (CC BY-SA).
Перехресні посилання
Інші уривки, які спільнота найчастіше пов'язує з цим. Торкнись, щоб прочитати.
Чи ж не ухо слова́ розбирає, піднебі́ння ж смакує для себе пожи́ву?
Чи без соли їдять несмачне́, чи є смак у білко́ві яйця́?
Бо ухо слова випробо́вує, а піднебі́ння їжу кушту́є.
А страва тверда́ — для дорослих, що мають чуття, при́вчені звичкою розрізняти добро й зло.