2-а Самуїлова 12:1
Простий, ясний розбір цього вірша. Читати розділ →
І послав Господь Ната́на до Давида, а він прийшов до нього та й сказав йому: „Два чолові́ки були́ в одно́му місті, — один замо́жний, а один убогий.
Коментарі
Витяги з опублікованих коментарів, щоб закласти основу прочитання.
Sa2 12:1-4 Nathan's Reproof. - Sa2 12:1. To ensure the success of his mission, viz., to charge the king with his crimes, Nathan resorted to a parable by which he led on the king to pronounce sentence of death upon himself. The parable is a very simple one, and drawn from life. Two men were living in a certain city: the one was rich, and had many sheep and oxen; the other was poor, and possessed nothing at all but one small lamb which he had bought and nourished (יחיּה, lit. kept alive), so that it grew up in his house along with his son, and was treated most tenderly and loved like a daughter. The custom of keeping pet-sheep in the house, as we keep lap-dogs, is still met with among the Arabs (vid., Bochart, Hieroz. i. p. 594). There came a traveller (הלך, a journey, for a traveller) to the rich man (לאישׁ without an article, the express definition being introduced afterwards in connection with the adjective העשׁיר; vid., Ewald, 293a, p. 741), and he grudged to take of his own sheep and oxen to prepare (sc., a meal) for the traveller who had come to his house; "and he took the poor man's lamb, and dressed it for the man that had come to him." Sa2 12:5-6 David was so enraged at this act of violence on the part of the rich man, that in the heat of his anger he pronounced this sentence at once: "As the Lord liveth, the man who did this deserves to die; and the lamb he shall restore fourfold." The fourfold restoration corresponds to the law in Exo 22:1. The culprit himself was also to be put to death, because the forcible robbery of a poor man's pet-lamb was almost as bad as man-stealing. Sa2 12:7-8 The parable was so selected that David could not suspect that it had reference to him and to his son. With all the greater shock therefore did the words of the prophet, "Thou ar…
Відкрити джерело ↗It seems to have been a great while after David had been guilty of adultery with Bath-sheba before he was brought to repentance for it. For, when Nathan was sent to him, the child was born (Sa2 12:14), so that it was about nine months that David lay under the guilt of that sin, and, for aught that appears, unrepented of. What shall we think of David's state all this while? Can we imagine that his heart never smote him for it, or that he never lamented it in secret before God? I would willingly hope that he did, and that Nathan was sent to him, immediately upon the birth of the child, when the thing by that means came to be publicly known and talked of, to draw from him an open confession of the sin, to the glory of God, the admonition of others, and that he might receive, by Nathan, absolution with certain limitations. But, during these nine months, we may well suppose his comforts and the exercises of his graces suspended, and his communion with God interrupted; during all that time, it is certain, he penned no psalms, his harp was out of tune, and his soul like a tree in winter, that has life in the root only. Therefore, after Nathan had been with him, he prays, Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation, and open thou my lips, Psa 51:12, Psa 51:15. Let us observe, I. The messenger God sent to him. We were told by the last words of the foregoing chapter that the thing David had done displeased the Lord, upon which, one would think, it should have followed that the Lord sent enemies to invade him, terrors to take hold on him, and the messengers of death to arrest him. No, he sent a prophet to him - Nathan, his faithful friend and confidant, to instruct and counsel him, Sa2 12:1. David did not send for Nathan (though he had never had so much occasion as he had now for his…
Відкрити джерело ↗12:1-31 Chapter 12 expands on the last phrase of 11:27. 12:1 The Lord sent Nathan to David at least nine months after his adulterous sin. • This story is a rare Old Testament instance of a parable (see also Judg 9:8-15). Such stories can be effective for communicating truth. • David was rich in the royal treasures he possessed, the number of wives he had, and all the promises of God for his future. Uriah by contrast was poor: he had one wife, one home, and no lineage.
Відкрити джерело ↗Мова оригіналу
Єврейські та грецькі слова за цим уривком, із номерами Стронга — від openscriptures (CC BY-SA).
Перехресні посилання
Інші уривки, які спільнота найчастіше пов'язує з цим. Торкнись, щоб прочитати.
А Ангол Господній говорив до тішб'янина Іллі: „Устань, вийди назу́стріч послів самарійського царя та й скажи їм: Чи через те, що нема в Ізраїлі Бога, ви йдете питатися Ваал-Зевува, екронського бога?
І сказав Давид до посла́: „Так скажеш до Йоава: Нехай не буде злою в оча́х твоїх ця річ, бо меч пожирає то цьо́го, то то́го. Підсиль війну свою проти міста, та й розвали його! І підбадьо́р його, Йоава!“
Бо ми конче помремо, і ми як та вода, вилита на землю, що її не зібрати. Та Бог не знищить душі, і Він заду́мав не відвернути від Се́бе віді́гнаного.
А ось чоловік Божий прийшов за Господнім словом із Юди до Бет-Елу. А Єровоам стояв при же́ртівнику, щоб кадити.
Як усі ці слова́, як усе це виді́ння, — так говорив Ната́н до Давида.
І минуло багато днів, і було Господнє слово до Іллі третього року, говорячи: „Іди, покажися до Аха́ва, а Я дам дощ на поверхню землі“.