Apostelgeschichte 26:8
Eine verständliche Vertiefung zu diesem Vers. Kapitel lesen →
Warum wird es bei euch für unglaublich gehalten, daß Gott Tote auferweckt?
Kommentare
Auszüge aus veröffentlichten Kommentaren, die die Auslegung untermauern.
Why should it be thought a thing incredible . . . that God should raise the dead?--rather, "Why is it judged a thing incredible if God raises the dead?" the case being viewed as an accomplished fact. No one dared to call in question the overwhelming evidence of the resurrection of Jesus, which proclaimed Him to be the Christ, the Son of God; the only way of getting rid of it, therefore, was to pronounce it incredible. But why, asks the apostle, is it so judged? Leaving this pregnant question to find its answer in the breasts of his audience, he now passes to his personal history.
Quelle öffnen ↗We left Paul at the bar, and Festus, and Agrippa, and Bernice, and all the great men of the city of Caesarea, upon the bench, or about it, waiting to hear what he had to say for himself. Now in this chapter we have, I. The account he gives of himself, in answer to the calumnies of the Jews. And in this, 1. His humble address to king Agrippa, and the compliment he passed upon him (Act 26:1-3). 2. His account of his origin, and education, his profession as a Pharisee, and his adherence still to that which was then the main article of his creed, in distinction from the Sadducees, the "resurrection of the dead," however in rituals he had since departed from it (Act 26:3-8). 3. Of his zeal against the Christian religion, and the professors of it, in the beginning of his time (Act 26:9-11). 4. Of his miraculous conversion to the faith of Christ (Act 26:12-16). 5. Of the commission he received from heaven to preach the gospel to the Gentiles (Act 26:17, Act 26:18). 6. Of his proceedings pursuant to that commission, which had given this mighty offence to the Jews (Act 26:19-21). 7. Of the doctrine which he had made it his business to preach to the Gentiles, which was so far from destroying the law and the prophets that it showed the fulfilling of both (Act 26:22, Act 26:23). II. The remarks that were made upon his apology. 1. Festus thought he never heard a man talk so madly, and slighted him as crazed (Act 26:24). In answer to him, he denies the charge, and appeals to king Agrippa (Act 26:25-27). 2. King Agrippa, being more closely and particularly dealt with, thinks he never heard a man talk more rationally and convincingly, and owns himself almost his convert (Act 26:28), and Paul heartily wishes him so (Act 26:29). 3. They all agreed that he was an innocent man, that he oug…
Quelle öffnen ↗Ursprache
Die hebräischen und griechischen Wörter hinter dieser Stelle, mit Strong-Nummern — von openscriptures (CC BY-SA).
Querverweise
Andere Stellen, die die Gemeinschaft am häufigsten mit dieser verbindet. Zum Lesen antippen.
Die verdroß es, daß sie das Volk lehrten und in Jesus die Auferstehung von den Toten verkündigten.
welcher den Leib unsrer Niedrigkeit umgestalten wird, daß er gleichgestaltet werde dem Leibe seiner Herrlichkeit, vermöge der Kraft, durch welche er sich auch alles untertan machen kann!
Er aber sprach: Was bei den Menschen unmöglich ist, das ist bei Gott möglich.
Da aber Paulus wußte, daß der eine Teil aus Sadduzäern, der andere aus Pharisäern bestand, rief er in die Ratsversammlung hinein: Ihr Männer und Brüder, ich bin ein Pharisäer und eines Pharisäers Sohn; wegen der Hoffnung und der Auferstehung der Toten werde ich gerichtet!
Sollte denn dem HERRN etwas zu wunderbar sein? Zur bestimmten Zeit will ich wieder zu dir kommen im künftigen Jahre, und Sarah soll einen Sohn haben!
dagegen hatten sie einige Streitfragen betreffend ihre Religion und einen verstorbenen Jesus, von welchem Paulus behauptete, er lebe.
Denn bei Gott ist kein Ding unmöglich.