Johannes 11:50
Eine verständliche Vertiefung zu diesem Vers. Kapitel lesen →
Ihr wisset nichts und bedenket nicht, daß es für uns besser ist, ein Mensch sterbe für das Volk, als daß das ganze Volk verderbe!
Kommentare
Auszüge aus veröffentlichten Kommentaren, die die Auslegung untermauern.
LAZARUS RAISED FROM THE DEAD--THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS. (John 11:1-46) of Bethany--at the east side of Mount Olivet. the town of Mary and her sister Martha--thus distinguishing it from the other Bethany, "beyond Jordan." (See on Joh 1:28; Joh 10:40).
Quelle öffnen ↗In this chapter we have the history of that illustrious miracle which Christ wrought a little before his death - the raising of Lazarus to life, which is recorded only by this evangelist; for the other three confine themselves to what Christ did in Galilee, where he resided most, and scarcely ever carried their history into Jerusalem till the passion-week: whereas John's memoirs relate chiefly to what passed at Jerusalem; this passage therefore was reserved for his pen. Some suggest that, when the other evangelists wrote, Lazarus was alive, and it would not well agree either with his safety or with his humility to have it recorded till now, when it is supposed he was dead. It is more largely recorded than any other of Christ's miracles, not only because there are many circumstances of it so very instructive and the miracle of itself so great a proof of Christ's mission, but because it was an earnest of that which was to be the crowning proof of all - Christ's own resurrection. Here is, I. The tidings sent to our Lord Jesus of the sickness of Lazarus, and his entertainment of those tidings (v. 1-16). II. The visit he made to Lazarus's relations when he had heard of his death, and their entertainment of the visit (v. 17-32). III. The miracle wrought in the raising of Lazarus from the dead (Joh 11:33-44). IV. The effect wrought by this miracle upon others (Joh 11:45-57).
Quelle öffnen ↗11:50-51 it’s better . . . that one man should die: Caiaphas’s words were ironic. He meant that it was better for a revolutionary to die than to have the Romans crush the entire Jewish nation. But Caiaphas was correct in a way that he could not perceive. The salvation that Judaism needed had little to do with Rome; it would come through the cross of Christ. John notes that Caiaphas’s inspiration was not his own but came from God.
Quelle öffnen ↗Querverweise
Andere Stellen, die die Gemeinschaft am häufigsten mit dieser verbindet. Zum Lesen antippen.
Das war der Kajaphas, der den Juden geraten hatte, es sei besser, daß ein Mensch für das Volk sterbe.
und sprach zu ihnen: So steht es geschrieben, daß Christus leiden und am dritten Tage von den Toten auferstehen werde,
Von da an suchte Pilatus ihn freizugeben. Aber die Juden schrieen und sprachen: Lässest du diesen frei, so bist du nicht des Kaisers Freund; denn wer sich selbst zum König macht, der ist wider den Kaiser!
Müßte man dann nicht so reden, wie wir verleumdet werden und wie etliche behaupten, daß wir sagen: »Lasset uns Böses tun, damit Gutes daraus komme«? Ihre Verurteilung ist gerecht!
Lassen wir ihn so fortfahren, so werden alle an ihn glauben; und dann kommen die Römer und nehmen uns Land und Leute weg.