2. Mose 22:10
Eine verständliche Vertiefung zu diesem Vers. Kapitel lesen →
so soll ein Eid bei dem HERRN zwischen beiden entscheiden, daß jener sich nicht vergriffen habe an seines Nächsten Gut; und der Eigentümer soll ihn annehmen und keine Entschädigung erhalten.
Kommentare
Auszüge aus veröffentlichten Kommentaren, die die Auslegung untermauern.
If an animal entrusted to a neighbour to take care of had either died or hurt itself (נשׁבּר, broken a limb), or been driven away by robbers when out at grass (Ch1 5:21; Ch2 14:14, cf. Job 1:15, Job 1:17), without any one (else) seeing it, an oath was to be taken before Jehovah between both (the owner and the keeper of it), "whether he had not stretched out his hand to his neighbour's property," i.e., either killed, or mutilated, or disposed of the animal. This case differs from the previous one, not only in the fact that the animal had either become useless to the owner or was altogether lost, but also in the fact that the keeper, if his statement were true, had not been at all to blame in the matter. The only way in which this could be decided, if there was ראה אין, i.e., no other eye-witness present than the keeper himself at the time when the fact occurred, was by the keeper taking an oath before Jehovah, that is to say, before the judicial court. And if he took the oath, the master (owner) of it (the animal that had perished, or been lost or injured) was to accept (sc., the oath), and he (the accused) was not to make reparation. "But if it had been stolen מעמּו from with him (i.e., from his house or stable), he was to make it good," because he might have prevented this with proper care (cf. Gen 31:39). On the other hand, if it had been torn in pieces (viz., by a beast of prey, while it was out at grass), he was not to make any compensation, but only to furnish a proof that he had not been wanting in proper care. עד יבאהוּ "let him bring it as a witness," viz., the animal that had been torn in pieces, or a portion of it, from which it might be seen that he had chased the wild beast to recover its prey (cf. Sa1 17:34-35; Amo 3:12).
Quelle öffnen ↗The laws of this chapter relate, I. To the eighth commandment, concerning theft (Exo 22:1-4), trespass by cattle (Exo 22:5), damage by fire (Exo 22:6), trusts (Exo 22:7-13), borrowing cattle (Exo 22:14, Exo 22:15), or money (Exo 22:25-27). II. To the seventh commandment. Against fornication (Exo 22:16, Exo 22:17), bestiality (Exo 22:19). III. To the first table, forbidding witchcraft (Exo 22:18), idolatry (Exo 22:20). Commanding to offer the firstfruits (Exo 22:29, Exo 22:30). IV. To the poor (Exo 22:21-24). V. To the civil government (Exo 22:28). VI. To the peculiarity of the Jewish nation (Exo 22:31).
Quelle öffnen ↗Ursprache
Die hebräischen und griechischen Wörter hinter dieser Stelle, mit Strong-Nummern — von openscriptures (CC BY-SA).
Querverweise
Andere Stellen, die die Gemeinschaft am häufigsten mit dieser verbindet. Zum Lesen antippen.
wer ihn aber nicht kannte und doch tat, was der Streiche wert ist, der wird wenig leiden müssen. Denn welchem viel gegeben ist, bei dem wird man viel suchen; und wem viel anvertraut ist, von dem wird man desto mehr fordern.
Aus diesem Grunde leide ich auch solches; aber ich schäme mich dessen nicht. Denn ich weiß, wem ich mein Vertrauen geschenkt habe, und ich bin überzeugt, daß er mächtig ist, das mir anvertraute Gut zu verwahren bis auf jenen Tag.
Wenn ihr nun in dem ungerechten Mammon nicht treu waret, wer wird euch das Wahre anvertrauen?
Er aber weigerte sich und sprach zu dem Weibe seines Herrn: Siehe, mein Herr verläßt sich auf mich und kümmert sich um nichts, was im Hause vorgeht, und hat mir alles anvertraut, was ihm gehört;