Hiob 4:7
Eine verständliche Vertiefung zu diesem Vers. Kapitel lesen →
Bedenke aber: ist je ein Unschuldiger umgekommen, oder wurden je Rechtschaffene vertilgt?
Kommentare
Auszüge aus veröffentlichten Kommentaren, die die Auslegung untermauern.
In reply to Sommer, who in his excellent biblische Abhandlungen, 1846, considers the octastich as the extreme limit of the compass of the strophe, it is sufficient to refer to the Syriac strophe-system. It is, however, certainly an impossibility that, as Ewald (Jahrb. ix. 37) remarks with reference to the first speech of Jehovah, Job 38-39, the strophes can sometimes extend to a length of 12 lines = Masoretic verses, consequently consist of 24 στίχοι and more. Then Eliphaz the Temanite began, and said:
Quelle öffnen ↗Eliphaz here advances another argument to prove Job a hypocrite, and will have not only his impatience under his afflictions to be evidence against him but even his afflictions themselves, being so very great and extraordinary, and there being no prospect at all of his deliverance out of them. To strengthen his argument he here lays down these two principles, which seem plausible enough: - I. That good men were never thus ruined. For the proof of this he appeals to Job's own observation (Job 4:7): "Remember, I pray thee; recollect all that thou hast seen, heard, or read, and give me an instance of any one that was innocent and righteous, and yet perished as thou dost, and was cut off as thou art." If we understand it of a final and eternal destruction, his principle is true. None that are innocent and righteous perish for ever: it is only a man of sin that is a son of perdition, Th2 2:3. But then it is ill applied to Job; he did not thus perish, nor was he cut off: a man is never undone till he is in hell. But, if we understand it of any temporal calamity, his principle is not true. The righteous perish (Isa 57:1): there is one event both to the righteous and to the wicked (Ecc 9:2), both in life and death; the great and certain difference is after death. Even before Job's time (as early as it was) there were instances sufficient to contradict this principle. Did not righteous Abel perish being innocent? and was he not cut off in the beginning of his days? Was not righteous Lot burnt out of house and harbour, and forced to retire to a melancholy cave? Was not righteous Jacob a Syrian ready to perish? Deu 26:5. Other such instances, no doubt, there were, which are not on record. II. That wicked men were often thus ruined. For the proof of this he vouches his own observat…
Quelle öffnen ↗4:7 Job probably counted his children among the innocent dead (1:5), and even Eliphaz must have known that innocent blood is sometimes shed (cp. Deut 19:10; Prov 6:17; Jer 7:6).
Quelle öffnen ↗Ursprache
Die hebräischen und griechischen Wörter hinter dieser Stelle, mit Strong-Nummern — von openscriptures (CC BY-SA).
Querverweise
Andere Stellen, die die Gemeinschaft am häufigsten mit dieser verbindet. Zum Lesen antippen.
Ich bin jung gewesen und alt geworden und habe nie den Gerechten verlassen gesehen, oder seinen Samen um Brot betteln.
so weiß der Herr die Gottseligen aus der Prüfung zu erretten, die Ungerechten aber für den Tag des Gerichts zur Bestrafung aufzubehalten,
Er wendet seine Augen nicht ab von den Gerechten und setzt sie auf ewig mit Königen auf den Thron, damit sie herrschen.
Wie aber die Einwohner das Tier an seiner Hand hängen sahen, sprachen sie zueinander: Gewiß ist dieser Mensch ein Mörder, den, ob er sich gleich aus dem Meere gerettet hat, die Rache dennoch nicht leben läßt.
Siehe, Gott verwirft den Unschuldigen nicht; er reicht aber auch keinem Übeltäter die Hand,
Allerlei habe ich gesehen in den Tagen meiner Eitelkeit: Da ist ein Gerechter, welcher umkommt in seiner Gerechtigkeit, und dort ist ein Gottloser, welcher lange lebt in seiner Bosheit.