لاويين ٢٢:٢٣
تأمّل عميق بلغةٍ واضحة على هذه الآية. اقرأ الأصحاح
وَأَمَّا الثَّوْرُ أَوِ الشَّاةُ الزَّوَائِدِيُّ أَوِ الْقُزُمُ فَنَافِلَةً تَعْمَلُهُ، وَلكِنْ لِنَذْرٍ لاَ يُرْضَى بِهِ.
التفاسير
مقتطفات جُمعت من تفاسير منشورة لترسيخ القراءة.
As a voluntary peace-offering they might indeed offer an ox or sheep that was רקלוּט שׂרוּע, "stretched out and drawn together," i.e., with the whole body or certain limbs either too large or too small; (Note: In explanation of these words Knobel very properly remarks, that with the Greeks the sacrificial animal was required to be ἀφελής (Pollux i. 1, 26), upon which Hesychius observes, μήτε πλεονάζων μήτε δέων τι τοῦ σώματος.) but such an animal could not be acceptable as a votive offering.
افتح المصدر ↗In this chapter we have divers laws concerning the priests and sacrifices all for the preserving of the honour of the sanctuary. I. That the priests should not eat the holy things in their uncleanness (Lev 22:1-9). II. That no stranger who did not belong to some family of the priests should eat of the holy things (Lev 22:10-13), and, if he did it unwittingly, he must make restitution, (Lev 22:14-16). III. That the sacrifices which were offered must be without blemish (Lev 22:17-25). IV. That they must be more than eight days old (Lev 22:26-28), and that the sacrifices of thanksgiving must be eaten the same day they were offered (Lev 22:29, etc.).
افتح المصدر ↗22:23 The requirements for the voluntary offering were more lenient, allowing the use of a deformed animal. Fulfilling a vow, however, still required an animal that was not maimed or diseased. In no case would God accept a sacrifice that could not be eaten by a person or that was not a whole animal.
افتح المصدر ↗اللغة الأصلية
الكلمات العبرية واليونانية وراء هذا المقطع، مع أرقام سترونغ — من openscriptures (CC BY-SA).
الشواهد المتقابلة
مقاطع أخرى يربطها المجتمع بهذا المقطع أكثر من غيرها. انقر لتقرأها.